Grimes v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Grimes v. State

105 So. 438, 21 Ala. App. 82, 1925 Ala. App. LEXIS 236

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 30, 1925

Docket7 Div. 85.

StatusPublished

This text of 105 So. 438 (Grimes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grimes v. State, 105 So. 438, 21 Ala. App. 82, 1925 Ala. App. LEXIS 236 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, J.

The defendant was convicted of violating the prohibition laws by having whisky in his possession, and appeals.

There is nothing new or novel involved in any question here presented. It would only consume space to discuss the evidence. The solicitor was properly allowed to file the complaint. Code 1923, § 3843.

As the ease was submitted to the jury, there was only one count in the complaint ; so the criticism of the verdict is *83 without merit. The statement objected to, in the argument by state’s counsel, was not improper. Bridgeforth v. State, 16 Ala. App. 584, 80 So. 158.

We have examined critically each exception reserved, as well as the record in this case, and, finding nowhere any prejudicial error, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI