Grimes v. Housing Authority

682 A.2d 1000, 239 Conn. 918, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 387
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 18, 1996·No. SC 15518·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 42 Conn. App. 324 (AC 14894), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the class action statute of limitations tolling rule, as articulated in American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah, 414 U.S. 538 (1973), and its progeny, did not apply so as to toll the statute of limitations applicable to the plaintiffs’ class action claims?”

[919]*919Decided September 18, 1996 Edward T. Krumreich and Miles F. McDonald, Jr., in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grimes v. Housing Authority, 682 A.2d 1000, 239 Conn. 918, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 387 (Colo. 1996).

682 A.2d 1000 (Grimes v. Housing Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grimes v. Housing Authority
698 A.2d 302 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1997)