Grimes v. Gowen

12 S.C.L. 137
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedMay 15, 1821
StatusPublished

This text of 12 S.C.L. 137 (Grimes v. Gowen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grimes v. Gowen, 12 S.C.L. 137 (S.C. 1821).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Huger

delivered tbe opinion of the Court.

I was of opinion when this case was submitted to me in the Circuit Court, that the words of the fee bill were general, and that only half costs.were allowed' in all cases, when the demand amounted to less than 8 50. The words of the act I find are not so general. Half costs are given only upon “liquidated” demands.,..and upon “open accounts.” Where the party has the means of regulating his demand by the sufn really due, and chooses to go for more, if he recover less than 8 50 he is allowed but half cost; but.wlíerí he hás not the means of regulating his demand by , any standard, and, claims damages to an uncertain amount as for a breach of warranty, if he recover even less' than 8t>0, the act does not reduce his costs.

The fee bill does not allow 8 5 36 for “ special matter .and argument” in a process'case as in others. The words of the act are for commencing and prosecuting,and defending a suit by summary process £ 1. which hás always been held to exclude all other fees for proceedings prior to execution.

Justices Notf, Johnson, Richardson, Colcock and Gantt., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 S.C.L. 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grimes-v-gowen-sc-1821.