Grimes v. . Fulton

147 S.E. 680, 197 N.C. 84, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 154
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 17, 1929·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

It is not conceded that the judge of “tbe municipal court of the city of High Point” bas the power to remove a cause from said municipal court to the Superior Court of a county other than Guilford for trial, but even if it were (wbicb question is not presented and therefore not decided), still the motion to remove, on the grounds stated, “for' the convenience of witnesses and to promote the ends of justice,” C. S., 470, rests in the sound discretion of the trial court, and is not reviewable on appeal in the absence of abuse of such discretion. Power Co. v. Klutz, 196 N. C., 358, and cases cited.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grimes v. . Fulton, 147 S.E. 680, 197 N.C. 84, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 154 (N.C. 1929).

147 S.E. 680 (Grimes v. . Fulton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Howard v. Queen City Coach Co.
193 S.E. 138 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1937)