Grimes v. . Fulton
This text of 147 S.E. 680 (Grimes v. . Fulton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is not conceded that the judge of “tbe municipal court of the city of High Point” bas the power to remove a cause from said municipal court to the Superior Court of a county other than Guilford for trial, but even if it were (wbicb question is not presented and therefore not decided), still the motion to remove, on the grounds stated, “for' the convenience of witnesses and to promote the ends of justice,” C. S., 470, rests in the sound discretion of the trial court, and is not reviewable on appeal in the absence of abuse of such discretion. Power Co. v. Klutz, 196 N. C., 358, and cases cited.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
147 S.E. 680, 197 N.C. 84, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grimes-v-fulton-nc-1929.