Grimes v. Fowler

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: July 21, 2004
• Docket: 04-6209
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6209

TIMOTHY GRIMES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

R. FOWLER; G. JOHNSON; W. P. TRUE; JOHN DOES, Officials of ROSP; CAPTAIN HOCKETT; W. SMITH; M. BUCHANAN; J. BENTLEY; JOHN DOES, Officials of WRSP; JOHN DOES, Practitioners ROSP; JEAN DOES, Red Onion State Prison; SERGEANT HEAD; PRISON GUARD BOWEN; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER OWENS,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

T. JOHNSON; A. BAKER,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. James P. Jones, Chief District Judge and Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-01-526-2)

Submitted: July 15, 2004 Decided: July 21, 2004

Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Timothy Grimes, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Foster Barr, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Alexander Leonard Taylor, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia; Gary Clay Hancock, Timothy Edmond Kirtner, GILMER, SADLER, INGRAM, SUTHERLAND & HUTTON, Pulaski, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Timothy Grimes appeals the district court’s order

granting judgment in favor of the Appellees in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) action in accordance with a jury verdict. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

the judgment of the district court. See Grimes v. Fowler, No. CA-

01-526-2 (W.D. Va. Jan. 23, 2004). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -