Grimes v. Fowler

Fourth Circuit

Grimes v. Fowler

102 F. App'x 807

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 21, 2004·No. No. 04-6209·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Grimes appeals the district court’s order granting judgment in favor of the Appellees in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action in accordance with a jury verdict. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See Grimes v. Fowler, No. CA-01-526-2 (W.D.Va. Jan. 23, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented [808] in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Grimes appeals the district court’s order granting judgment in favor of the Appellees in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action in accordance with a jury verdict. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See Grimes v. Fowler, No. CA-01-526-2 (W.D.Va. Jan. 23, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented [808] in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Grimes v. Fowler, 102 F. App'x 807 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

102 F. App'x 807 (Grimes v. Fowler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related