Grimes v. Enterprise Leasing Co.
84 A.3d 1058
This text of 84 A.3d 1058 (Grimes v. Enterprise Leasing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Grimes v. Enterprise Leasing Co., 84 A.3d 1058 (Pa. 2014).
Opinion
[1059]*1059 ORDER
AND NOW, this BOth day of January, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:
1. Whether the Superior Court erred when it held that a private plaintiff who alleges deceptive conduct under the UTPCPL’s “catch-all” provision, 73 P.S. § 201-2(4)(xxi), need not allege and prove justifiable reliance, contrary to the decisions of this Court, earlier decisions of the Superior Court, and federal decisions construing the UTPCPL.
2. Whether the Superior Court erred when it held that a plaintiff may satisfy the UTPCPL’s “ascertainable loss” requirement by voluntarily hiring an attorney and allegedly incurring litigation costs to challenge allegedly wrongful conduct, even where, as here, the plaintiff paid no money to the defendant as a result of that conduct.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Grimes v. Enterprise Leasing Co. of Philadelphia, LLC
105 A.3d 1188 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2014)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
84 A.3d 1058, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grimes-v-enterprise-leasing-co-pa-2014.