Grimes v. District of Columbia Government
This text of Grimes v. District of Columbia Government (Grimes v. District of Columbia Government) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
___________________________________ ) KEITH B. GRIMES, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11-0416 (RLW) ) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On May 24, 2011, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss or, alternatively, for summary
judgment. In its May 31, 2011 Order, the Court advised the plaintiff, among other things, of his
obligation to file an opposition or other response to the motion. Further, that Order expressly
warned the plaintiff that, if he failed to file his opposition by July 1, 2011, the Court would treat the
motion as conceded. The Court granted the plaintiff’s request for an extension of time, to July 7,
2011, yet, to date, the plaintiff neither has filed an opposition nor requested additional time to do
so.
The Court will grant the defendants’ Motion to Treat [Their] Motion to Dismiss or, in the
Alternative, for Summary Judgment As Conceded. An Order accompanies this Memorandum
Opinion.
_______/s/____________________ DATE: July 20, 2011 ROBERT L. WILKINS United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Grimes v. District of Columbia Government, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grimes-v-district-of-columbia-government-dcd-2011.