Grimes v. County of Beaufort

21 S.E.2d 827, 222 N.C. 41, 1942 N.C. LEXIS 16
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 23, 1942
StatusPublished

This text of 21 S.E.2d 827 (Grimes v. County of Beaufort) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grimes v. County of Beaufort, 21 S.E.2d 827, 222 N.C. 41, 1942 N.C. LEXIS 16 (N.C. 1942).

Opinion

Devin, J.

Tbe appellants assign as error in tbe judgment below tbe approval of tbe referee’s conclusion of law tbat plaintiff’s claim was not barred by tbe statute of limitations. There was, however, no exception to tbe referee’s findings of fact upon which this conclusion of law was based. These findings were supported by competent evidence, and were adopted in all material respects by tbe court. Hence, tbe judgment in favor of tbe plaintiff upon tbe facts so established must be upheld. Wilkinson v. Coppersmith, 218 N. C., 173, 10 S. E. (2d), 670.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilkinson v. . Coppersmith
10 S.E.2d 670 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 S.E.2d 827, 222 N.C. 41, 1942 N.C. LEXIS 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grimes-v-county-of-beaufort-nc-1942.