Grimes v. County of Beaufort

21 S.E.2d 827, 222 N.C. 41, 1942 N.C. LEXIS 16
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 23, 1942·Published

Opinion

Devin, J.

Tbe appellants assign as error in tbe judgment below tbe approval of tbe referee’s conclusion of law tbat plaintiff’s claim was not barred by tbe statute of limitations. There was, however, no exception to tbe referee’s findings of fact upon which this conclusion of law was based. These findings were supported by competent evidence, and were adopted in all material respects by tbe court. Hence, tbe judgment in favor of tbe plaintiff upon tbe facts so established must be upheld. Wilkinson v. Coppersmith, 218 N. C., 173, 10 S. E. (2d), 670.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grimes v. County of Beaufort, 21 S.E.2d 827, 222 N.C. 41, 1942 N.C. LEXIS 16 (N.C. 1942).

21 S.E.2d 827 (Grimes v. County of Beaufort) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilkinson v. . Coppersmith
10 S.E.2d 670 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1940)