Grimes v. Conservation Commission
This text of 686 A.2d 121 (Grimes v. Conservation Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition of the intervening defendant, James B. Irwin, for certification for appeal from the Appellate [944]*944Court, 43 Conn. App. 227 (AC 14698), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff was deprived of due process of law by the conduct of the conservation commission regarding its September 14, 1993 site visit?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
686 A.2d 121, 239 Conn. 943, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grimes-v-conservation-commission-conn-1996.