Grimes v. Conservation Commission

686 A.2d 121, 239 Conn. 943, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 475
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedNovember 20, 1996
DocketSC 15574
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 686 A.2d 121 (Grimes v. Conservation Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grimes v. Conservation Commission, 686 A.2d 121, 239 Conn. 943, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 475 (Colo. 1996).

Opinion

The petition of the intervening defendant, James B. Irwin, for certification for appeal from the Appellate [944]*944Court, 43 Conn. App. 227 (AC 14698), is granted, limited to the following issue:

Decided November 20, 1996 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15574. Kenneth R. Slater, Jr., in support of the petition. William C. Franklin, in opposition.

“Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff was deprived of due process of law by the conduct of the conservation commission regarding its September 14, 1993 site visit?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grimes v. Conservation Commission
712 A.2d 984 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1998)
Grimes v. Conservation Commission
703 A.2d 101 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
686 A.2d 121, 239 Conn. 943, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grimes-v-conservation-commission-conn-1996.