Grimes v. Conservation Commission
686 A.2d 121, 239 Conn. 943, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 475
Opinion
The petition of the intervening defendant, James B. Irwin, for certification for appeal from the Appellate [944] Court, 43 Conn. App. 227 (AC 14698), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff was deprived of due process of law by the conduct of the conservation commission regarding its September 14, 1993 site visit?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Grimes v. Conservation Commission, 686 A.2d 121, 239 Conn. 943, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 475 (Colo. 1996).
686 A.2d 121 (Grimes v. Conservation Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Grimes v. Conservation Commission
712 A.2d 984 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1998)
Grimes v. Conservation Commission
703 A.2d 101 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1997)