Grimes v. City Commissioners of Florence

172 So. 357, 27 Ala. App. 362, 1937 Ala. App. LEXIS 13
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 2, 1937
Docket8 Div. 497.
StatusPublished

This text of 172 So. 357 (Grimes v. City Commissioners of Florence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grimes v. City Commissioners of Florence, 172 So. 357, 27 Ala. App. 362, 1937 Ala. App. LEXIS 13 (Ala. Ct. App. 1937).

Opinion

SAMFORD, Judge.

Defendant was convicted of a violation of a city ordinance, and from that judgment she appeals.

This record has been read by'the court sitting en banc, and we have reached the conclusion that the evidence for the city does not sufficiently connect the defendant with the possession of the whisky, found on premises not under the control of the defendant, in such sort as to authorize a conviction.

At the conclusion of the city’s evidence, the defendant moved to exclude such evidence, and this motion should have been granted. For the error in refusing to exclude the city’s evidence, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
172 So. 357, 27 Ala. App. 362, 1937 Ala. App. LEXIS 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grimes-v-city-commissioners-of-florence-alactapp-1937.