Grimes v. Ashley

113 So. 3d 1026, 2013 WL 2234014, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8156
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 22, 2013·No. No. 1D12-3559·Published

Opinion

THOMAS, J.

Appellant appeals the denial of his petition for a writ of mandamus seeking removal of a detainer. The trial court failed to address Appellant’s argument that the charges that formed the basis of the de-tainer were barred by the expiration of the statute of limitations. As we must consider Appellant’s allegations in his petition as true, Appellant has sufficiently alleged a basis for removal of the detainer, and the trial court should have considered the same. See Jenkins v. State, 957 So.2d 20 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007); Perkins v. State, 766 So.2d 1173 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).

Accordingly, we reverse the appealed order and remand with directions to the lower court to expeditiously issue an order to the Okaloosa County Sheriffs Office to show cause why mandamus should not be granted and the detainer removed.

[1027]*1027REVERSED and REMANDED with directions.

BENTON, C.J., and CLARK, J„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grimes v. Ashley, 113 So. 3d 1026, 2013 WL 2234014, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8156 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

113 So. 3d 1026 (Grimes v. Ashley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jenkins v. State
957 So. 2d 20 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Perkins v. State
766 So. 2d 1173 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)