Grimes (Bennett) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)

Nevada Supreme Court

Grimes (Bennett) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)

DecidedJuly 9, 2020

Docket81335

StatusPublished

This text of Grimes (Bennett) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State) (Grimes (Bennett) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grimes (Bennett) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State), (Neb. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

BENNETT GRIMES, No. 81335 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF HLED CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE MICHELLE LEAVITT, DISTRICT JUL 0 9 2020 JUDGE, CLE EU A. BROWN RENE COURT Respondents, BY DEPUTY CLERK and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus seeking a writ directing the district court to "honor relief requested in motion to correct/modify illegal sentence." Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRAP 21(b).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVAOA

(01 1947A 44Dro ?A- vS3461 We reiterate that Ipjetitioned cardies] the burden of . demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted." Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

Pieku ,C.J. Pickering

/A,. - 9- Hardesty •16.- 1444G4.42 Stiglich J.

cc: Hon. Michelle Leavitt, District Judge Bennett Grimes Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

BENNETT GRIMES, No. 81335 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF HLED CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE MICHELLE LEAVITT, DISTRICT JUL 0 9 2020 JUDGE, CLE EU A. BROWN RENE COURT Respondents, BY DEPUTY CLERK and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus seeking a writ directing the district court to "honor relief requested in motion to correct/modify illegal sentence." Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRAP 21(b).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVAOA

(01 1947A 44Dro ?A- vS3461 We reiterate that Ipjetitioned cardies] the burden of . demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted." Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

Pieku ,C.J. Pickering

/A,. - 9- Hardesty •16.- 1444G4.42 Stiglich J.

cc: Hon. Michelle Leavitt, District Judge Bennett Grimes Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Grimes (Bennett) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grimes-bennett-vs-dist-ct-state-nev-2020.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack