Grimaldi v. Vasilakis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Grimaldi v. Vasilakis

61 A.D.3d 932, 877 N.Y.S.2d 690

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 28, 2009

StatusPublished

This text of 61 A.D.3d 932 (Grimaldi v. Vasilakis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grimaldi v. Vasilakis, 61 A.D.3d 932, 877 N.Y.S.2d 690 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and wrongful death, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DeMaro, J.), entered December 27, 2007, as granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The defendants established, prima facie, their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see generally Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1141). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Rivera, J.P., Balkin, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur. [See 2007 NY Slip Op 34236(U).]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and wrongful death, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DeMaro, J.), entered December 27, 2007, as granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The defendants established, prima facie, their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see generally Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1141). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Rivera, J.P., Balkin, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur. [See 2007 NY Slip Op 34236(U).]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 A.D.3d 932, 877 N.Y.S.2d 690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grimaldi-v-vasilakis-nyappdiv-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack