Grim v. Walbert

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Grim v. Walbert

25 A. 1077, 155 Pa. 147, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1207

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 13, 1893·No. Appeal, No. 259·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Pee Cueiam,

The single question in this case is whether the plaintiff or the defendants shall pay the costs of the proceedings below. The costs in equity are always within the discretion of a chancellor, and it is only where there is a clear abuse of this discretion that we would interfere. We see no such abuse in this case, and for this reason

The decree is affirmed, and the appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam,

The single question in this case is whether the plaintiff or the defendants shall pay the costs of the proceedings below. The costs in equity are always within the discretion of a chancellor, and it is only where there is a clear abuse of this discretion that we would interfere. We see no such abuse in this case, and for this reason

The decree is affirmed, and the appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant.

Grim v. Walbert, 25 A. 1077, 155 Pa. 147, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1207 (Pa. 1893).

Pincite

25 A. 1077 (Grim v. Walbert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related