Grim v. Donovan

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Grim v. Donovan

498 So. 2d 1050, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 24, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10970

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 17, 1986

DocketNo. 85-2771

StatusPublished

This text of 498 So. 2d 1050 (Grim v. Donovan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grim v. Donovan, 498 So. 2d 1050, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 24, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10970 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment dismissing an action for wrongful death predicated upon the alleged negligence of the appellee, South Florida Water Management District, in failing to remove an obstruction from a canal which the appellee allegedly had the non-delegable duty to maintain. The trial court dismissed the action upon the District’s claim that it enjoyed sovereign immunity with reference to its involvement with the canal in question. We reverse.

Our reversal is predicated not on our conclusion that the District is not immune from liability but rather upon the undeveloped state of the record on this issue. The complaint alleges that the District is lawfully responsible for maintaining the canal free of navigational obstructions and that, notwithstanding that responsibility, the District, in the face of numerous complaints over a period of several weeks, allowed a large log to obstruct boat traffic in the canal. The complaint further alleged that the failure to remove the log resulted in the nighttime boating accident which killed Joseph Grim. All we have before us is the complaint. In our view that complaint states a cause of action by alleging in essence that the District failed to correct a dangerous condition that it knew about and had a non-delegable duty to correct. Cf. Cutler v. City of Jacksonville Beach, 489 So.2d 126 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). Whether or not those allegations can be proven or the District can establish proof supporting its claim of sovereign immunity, we cannot say.

Accordingly, the judgment of dismissal is reversed with directions for further proceedings in accord herewith.

DOWNEY and ANSTEAD, JJ., and WILLIS, BEN C., Associate Judge (Retired), concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment dismissing an action for wrongful death predicated upon the alleged negligence of the appellee, South Florida Water Management District, in failing to remove an obstruction from a canal which the appellee allegedly had the non-delegable duty to maintain. The trial court dismissed the action upon the District’s claim that it enjoyed sovereign immunity with reference to its involvement with the canal in question. We reverse.

Our reversal is predicated not on our conclusion that the District is not immune from liability but rather upon the undeveloped state of the record on this issue. The complaint alleges that the District is lawfully responsible for maintaining the canal free of navigational obstructions and that, notwithstanding that responsibility, the District, in the face of numerous complaints over a period of several weeks, allowed a large log to obstruct boat traffic in the canal. The complaint further alleged that the failure to remove the log resulted in the nighttime boating accident which killed Joseph Grim. All we have before us is the complaint. In our view that complaint states a cause of action by alleging in essence that the District failed to correct a dangerous condition that it knew about and had a non-delegable duty to correct. Cf. Cutler v. City of Jacksonville Beach, 489 So.2d 126 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). Whether or not those allegations can be proven or the District can establish proof supporting its claim of sovereign immunity, we cannot say.

Accordingly, the judgment of dismissal is reversed with directions for further proceedings in accord herewith.

DOWNEY and ANSTEAD, JJ., and WILLIS, BEN C., Associate Judge (Retired), concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

498 So. 2d 1050, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 24, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10970, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grim-v-donovan-fladistctapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack