Grillo v. United States
This text of 42 F.2d 451 (Grillo v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Without entering into details of this ease, it suffices to say the record fails to show that any exception was taken at the trial raising the alleged error now sought to be reviewed. Moreover, the trial judge refused to certify that such exception was taken. There is no allegation that there was anything arbitrary done by the judge. Under the authorities, Suydam v. Williamson, 29 How. 427, 15 L. Ed. 978; Fraina v. U. S., 255 F. 28 (C. C. A. 2d); Allemanni v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 273 F. 523; Phoenix Insurance Co. v. Lanier, 95 U. S. 171, 24 L. Ed. 383, we decline to review sueh alleged errors, and are constrained to affirm the judgment below.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
42 F.2d 451, 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 4311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grillo-v-united-states-ca3-1930.