Grigsby v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Grigsby v. State

100 So. 82, 19 Ala. App. 661, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 96

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 13, 1924

Docket8 Div. 133.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 100 So. 82 (Grigsby v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grigsby v. State, 100 So. 82, 19 Ala. App. 661, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 96 (Ala. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

The evidence in this case was sufficient to justify the jury in finding a verdict of guilt.

Charge 5 was properly refused. ‘ Before the jury is justified in rejecting the entire testimony of a witness on the ground of “falsus in uno. falsus in omnibus,” it must appear from the evidence that the witness has willfully sworn falsely to a material fact in the ease.

There is no error in the record,- and- the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI