Grigsby v. State
100 So. 82, 19 Ala. App. 661, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 96
Opinion
The evidence in this case was sufficient to justify the jury in finding a verdict of guilt.
Charge 5 was properly refused. ‘ Before the jury is justified in rejecting the entire testimony of a witness on the ground of “falsus in uno. falsus in omnibus,” it must appear from the evidence that the witness has willfully sworn falsely to a material fact in the ease.
There is no error in the record,- and- the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Grigsby v. State, 100 So. 82, 19 Ala. App. 661, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 96 (Ala. Ct. App. 1924).
100 So. 82 (Grigsby v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bahakel v. Great Southern Trucking Co.
31 So. 2d 75 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1947)