Grigsby & Associates, Inc. v. M Securities Investment

693 F.3d 1316, 2012 WL 3798239, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 18601
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedSeptember 4, 2012
Docket09-11817
StatusPublished

This text of 693 F.3d 1316 (Grigsby & Associates, Inc. v. M Securities Investment) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grigsby & Associates, Inc. v. M Securities Investment, 693 F.3d 1316, 2012 WL 3798239, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 18601 (11th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

ORDER:

This matter is before the Court on a Petition for Rehearing. The Court presently plans to enter, in the future, an order along this line:

“The motion for rehearing is DENIED, except our decision on the denial of an injunction of arbitration is totally withdrawn: that issue is moot given that the arbitration has been completed with the participation of the parties.
The order confirming the arbitration award is vacated and the case remanded for further proceedings. The award may be confirmed only if the district court determines de novo — anew, by itself, and for itself — that the Defendants did not waive the right to arbitrate by their pre-arbitration conduct, including their earlier filing several lawsuits against Plaintiffs.”

The parties have 15 days from the date of this order to explain why the proposed order on rehearing should not be entered. *1317 The explanation from each party must not exceed 12 pages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
693 F.3d 1316, 2012 WL 3798239, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 18601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grigsby-associates-inc-v-m-securities-investment-ca11-2012.