Griggs v. Wingard Transport LLC

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma·Decided March 1, 2021·No. 5:20-cv-01287·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

KELLY J. GRIGGS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) -vs- ) Case No. CIV-20-1287-F ) WINGARD TRANSPORT, LLC, an ) Oklahoma limited liability company, ) et al., ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER CRST Expedited, Inc.’s amended motion to intervene is before the court. Doc. no. 19. Any objection to the motion was due February 26, 2021. No objection, and no request for an extension of time within which to object, has been filed. Doc. no. 19. The motion to intervene is GRANTED on the ground that it has been confessed. See, LCvR7.1(g) (any motion not opposed within twenty-one days may, in the discretion of the court, be deemed confessed). Accordingly, a Petition In Intervention which complies with the requirement stated below SHALL be filed within seven days of today’s date. The proposed Petition in Intervention attached to the motion as an exhibit does not identify the state in which the intervening party, CRST Expedited, Inc., is incorporated or the state in which it has its principal place of business. The court has a duty to assess its jurisdiction. Tuck v. United Services Automobile Assoc., 859 F.2d 842, 844 (10th Cir. 1998); and see, Salt Lake Tribune Publishing Co., LLC v. AT&T Corp., 320 F.3d 1081, 1096 (10th Cir. 2003) (once established, diversity jurisdiction is not defeated by the addition of a non-diverse party; however, diversity jurisdiction will be destroyed if it is determined that the later-joined, non-diverse party was indispensable to the action at the time it commenced). Accordingly, when the Petition in Intervention is filed, it SHALL set forth the specific states in which CRST Expedited, Inc. is incorporated and has its principal place of business. After reviewing those allegations, the court will determine whether further motions or briefing are required with respect to jurisdiction. IT IS SO ORDERED this 1* day of March, 2021.

STEPHEN P. [ pait UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20-1287p003.docx

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Griggs v. Wingard Transport LLC, (W.D. Okla. 2021).

Griggs v. Wingard Transport LLC (Griggs v. Wingard Transport LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Salt Lake Tribune Publishing Co. v. AT & T Corp.
320 F.3d 1081 (Tenth Circuit, 2003)