Griggs v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Griggs v. State

837 So. 2d 1186, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2186, 2003 WL 470299

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 26, 2003

DocketNo. 4D02-4086

StatusPublished

This text of 837 So. 2d 1186 (Griggs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Griggs v. State, 837 So. 2d 1186, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2186, 2003 WL 470299 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse an order denying Appellant’s motion to correct sentence. The record reflects that the amount of time credited for time served does not include the time Appellant served in county jail from the date Appellant was adjudicated and returned to custody (January 8, 2002) to await sentencing through the date of sentencing (March 28, 2002). In all other respects, we find no reversible error. We, accordingly, remand for further proceedings.

STONE, FARMER, and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse an order denying Appellant’s motion to correct sentence. The record reflects that the amount of time credited for time served does not include the time Appellant served in county jail from the date Appellant was adjudicated and returned to custody (January 8, 2002) to await sentencing through the date of sentencing (March 28, 2002). In all other respects, we find no reversible error. We, accordingly, remand for further proceedings.

STONE, FARMER, and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

837 So. 2d 1186, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2186, 2003 WL 470299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griggs-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.