Griggs v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Griggs v. State

658 S.W.2d 371, 280 Ark. 339, 1983 Ark. LEXIS 1516

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedOctober 10, 1983

DocketCR 83-119

StatusPublished

Cited by13 cases

This text of 658 S.W.2d 371 (Griggs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Griggs v. State, 658 S.W.2d 371, 280 Ark. 339, 1983 Ark. LEXIS 1516 (Ark. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

George Rose Smith, Justice.

After a non-jury trial the three appellants, brothers, were found guilty of third-degree battery and sentenced to fines of $750 and to a year in jail, with nine months suspended. The defendants were represented by trial attorneys in the court below, but the record does not show that the defendants personally waived a jury trial either in writing or in open court, as contemplated by A.R.Cr.P. Rules 31.1 and 31.2. There is no assertion that the defendants did not in fact waive a jury, but it is argued by appellate counsel that the omission in the record entitles them to a new trial. The case was transferred to us by the Court of Appeals under Rule 29 (1) (c).

There is a constitutional right to a jury trial in felony cases, but the manner of waiver is not specified by the constitution, any more than the manner of entering a plea of guilty is so specified. See Smith v. State, 264 Ark. 329, 571 S.W.2d 591 (1978). Even a constitutional question, which this one is not, must be raised in the trial court to be reviewable on appeal. Shepherd v. State, 270 Ark. 457, 605 S.W.2d 414 (1980). The present question not having been raised below in any manner, no issue is presented for our decision.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

George Rose Smith, Justice.

After a non-jury trial the three appellants, brothers, were found guilty of third-degree battery and sentenced to fines of $750 and to a year in jail, with nine months suspended. The defendants were represented by trial attorneys in the court below, but the record does not show that the defendants personally waived a jury trial either in writing or in open court, as contemplated by A.R.Cr.P. Rules 31.1 and 31.2. There is no assertion that the defendants did not in fact waive a jury, but it is argued by appellate counsel that the omission in the record entitles them to a new trial. The case was transferred to us by the Court of Appeals under Rule 29 (1) (c).

There is a constitutional right to a jury trial in felony cases, but the manner of waiver is not specified by the constitution, any more than the manner of entering a plea of guilty is so specified. See Smith v. State, 264 Ark. 329, 571 S.W.2d 591 (1978). Even a constitutional question, which this one is not, must be raised in the trial court to be reviewable on appeal. Shepherd v. State, 270 Ark. 457, 605 S.W.2d 414 (1980). The present question not having been raised below in any manner, no issue is presented for our decision.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

658 S.W.2d 371, 280 Ark. 339, 1983 Ark. LEXIS 1516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griggs-v-state-ark-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack