Griggs v. Day

The Superior Court of New York City

Griggs v. Day

27 Jones & S. 560, 36 N.Y. St. Rep. 78

The Superior Court of New York City·Decided January 5, 1891·Published

Opinion

The Court (Freedman, J., writing) held, after a further hearing of counsel on the settlement of the order, that in view of the complicated state of the accounts between the parties, the defendant should have a further hearing upon a new trial, and that the order to be entered should provide for the unconditional reversal of the judgment upon the facts .as well as the law, and for a new trial, in accordance with the principles laid down in the opinion reported in 58 N. Y. Superior Court Reports, 385.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court (Freedman, J., writing) held, after a further hearing of counsel on the settlement of the order, that in view of the complicated state of the accounts between the parties, the defendant should have a further hearing upon a new trial, and that the order to be entered should provide for the unconditional reversal of the judgment upon the facts .as well as the law, and for a new trial, in accordance with the principles laid down in the opinion reported in 58 N. Y. Superior Court Reports, 385.

Griggs v. Day, 27 Jones & S. 560, 36 N.Y. St. Rep. 78 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

Pincite

27 Jones & S. 560 (Griggs v. Day) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.