Griggs v. Day

The Superior Court of New York City

Griggs v. Day

27 Jones & S. 560, 36 N.Y. St. Rep. 78

CourtThe Superior Court of New York City

DecidedJanuary 5, 1891

StatusPublished

This text of 27 Jones & S. 560 (Griggs v. Day) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Griggs v. Day, 27 Jones & S. 560, 36 N.Y. St. Rep. 78 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court (Freedman, J., writing) held, after a further hearing of counsel on the settlement of the order, that in view of the complicated state of the accounts between the parties, the defendant should have a further hearing upon a new trial, and that the order to be entered should provide for the unconditional reversal of the judgment upon the facts .as well as the law, and for a new trial, in accordance with the principles laid down in the opinion reported in 58 N. Y. Superior Court Reports, 385.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court (Freedman, J., writing) held, after a further hearing of counsel on the settlement of the order, that in view of the complicated state of the accounts between the parties, the defendant should have a further hearing upon a new trial, and that the order to be entered should provide for the unconditional reversal of the judgment upon the facts .as well as the law, and for a new trial, in accordance with the principles laid down in the opinion reported in 58 N. Y. Superior Court Reports, 385.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 Jones & S. 560, 36 N.Y. St. Rep. 78, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griggs-v-day-nysuperctnyc-1891.