Grigat v. Tyco International (US), Inc.
This text of 322 F. App'x 747 (Grigat v. Tyco International (US), Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
After oral argument and careful consideration, the judgment of the district court is due to be affirmed for the reasons fully discussed at oral argument. With respect to plaintiff’s equitable estoppel claim, we need not decide whether the district court abused its discretion in declining to permit plaintiffs’ untimely motion to amend, because we agree with the district court that, in light of the language of the Medical Plan, the Separation Plan and the June 11, 2001 COBRA Enrollment Notice, there could be no reasonable reliance by plaintiff on the June 18, 2001 COBRA Confirmation of Enrollment or on the several conflicting oral statements.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
322 F. App'x 747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grigat-v-tyco-international-us-inc-ca11-2009.