Grifka v. Nordlinger

277 A.D.2d 881

This text of 277 A.D.2d 881 (Grifka v. Nordlinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grifka v. Nordlinger, 277 A.D.2d 881 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Opinion

Action to recover damages by reason of alleged misrepresentations by defendants of authority to enter into a contract for the sale of merchandise. On appeal from so much of an order, as resettled, as strikes certain words from a paragraph of the answer and permits substitution thereof by way of amended pleading, order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, with leave to respondent to serve an amended answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 900.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
277 A.D.2d 881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grifka-v-nordlinger-nyappdiv-1950.