Griffiths v. Schantz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Griffiths v. Schantz

262 A.D. 801, 28 N.Y.S.2d 745, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5907

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 7, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 262 A.D. 801 (Griffiths v. Schantz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Griffiths v. Schantz, 262 A.D. 801, 28 N.Y.S.2d 745, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5907 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order, so far as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. All concur. (The separate portions of the order appealed from directs defendant to audit petitioner’s claim with respect to certain headings in the preparation of an assessment roll but fails to direct the audit of petitioner’s claim for compensation in a mandamus proceeding.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and McCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order, so far as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. All concur. (The separate portions of the order appealed from directs defendant to audit petitioner’s claim with respect to certain headings in the preparation of an assessment roll but fails to direct the audit of petitioner’s claim for compensation in a mandamus proceeding.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and McCurn, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D. 801, 28 N.Y.S.2d 745, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griffiths-v-schantz-nyappdiv-1941.