Griffiths v. Schantz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Griffiths v. Schantz

262 A.D. 801, 28 N.Y.S.2d 745, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5907

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 7, 1941·Published

Opinion

— Order, so far as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. All concur. (The separate portions of the order appealed from directs defendant to audit petitioner’s claim with respect to certain headings in the preparation of an assessment roll but fails to direct the audit of petitioner’s claim for compensation in a mandamus proceeding.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and McCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order, so far as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. All concur. (The separate portions of the order appealed from directs defendant to audit petitioner’s claim with respect to certain headings in the preparation of an assessment roll but fails to direct the audit of petitioner’s claim for compensation in a mandamus proceeding.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and McCurn, JJ.

Griffiths v. Schantz, 262 A.D. 801, 28 N.Y.S.2d 745, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5907 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

262 A.D. 801 (Griffiths v. Schantz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.