Griffiths v. Hughes

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 1, 2010·No. 10-6555·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6555

CHESTER C. GRIFFITHS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MR. HUGHES, United States Marshal,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:09-cv-01657-JFM)

Submitted: June 24, 2010 Decided: July 1, 2010

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Chester C. Griffiths, Appellant Pro Se. Alex Gordon, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Chester C. Griffiths appeals the district court’s

order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens

v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403

U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Griffiths v. Hughes, No. 1:09-cv-01657-

JFM (D. Md. Mar. 26, 2010). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Griffiths v. Hughes, (4th Cir. 2010).

Griffiths v. Hughes (Griffiths v. Hughes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related