Griffiths v. Griffiths
61 A.2d 249, 142 N.J. Eq. 751
Opinion
The decree will be affirmed, fox the reasons expressed in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Grimshaw.
For affirmance — -The Chiee-Justioe, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Wacheneeld, Eastwood, Burling, Jacobs, Wells, Dill, Ereund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 13.
For reversal — Colie, J. 1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Griffiths v. Griffiths, 61 A.2d 249, 142 N.J. Eq. 751 (N.J. 1948).
61 A.2d 249 (Griffiths v. Griffiths) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Muller v. Weinstein
219 F. Supp. 230 (D. New Jersey, 1963)
National-Ben Franklin Fire Insurance v. Camden Trust Co.
120 A.2d 754 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1956)
Seylaz v. Bennett
74 A.2d 309 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1950)
Blake v. Brennan
61 A.2d 916 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1948)