Griffith v. Welsh
32 Ill. App. 396, 1889 Ill. App. LEXIS 157
Opinion
The judgment in this case must be affirmed because the bill of exceptions fails to show that a motion for a new trial, or exception to the judgment was - made. The record of the judgment as certified by the clerk does so show, but this is not the proper mode. James v. Dexter, 113 Ill. 654; Dickett v. Durrell, 11 Ill. 72; Law v. Fletcher, 84 Ill. 45.
The judgment of the County Court will therefore be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Griffith v. Welsh, 32 Ill. App. 396, 1889 Ill. App. LEXIS 157 (Ill. Ct. App. 1890).
32 Ill. App. 396 (Griffith v. Welsh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Deam v. Lowy
44 Ill. App. 302 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1892)