Griffith v. State

78 S.W. 847, 47 Tex. Crim. 64, 1904 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 222
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 20, 1904
DocketNo. 2884.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 78 S.W. 847 (Griffith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Griffith v. State, 78 S.W. 847, 47 Tex. Crim. 64, 1904 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 222 (Tex. 1904).

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

This conviction is for rape, the penalty assessed being seventeen and a half years in the penitentiary. The court charged the jury with reference to insanity. The facts do not suggest this issue. We deem it unnecessary to go into a statement of the evidence, as insanity is clearly not raised. This was error. There was some evidence introduced going to show appellant was not a strong-minded negro, but nothing to show insanity.

It is contended that the evidence is not sufficient to support the conviction for rape. We pretermit a discussion of that question, as the case will be tried again before a jury and the verdict may be different.

Bill of exceptions was reserved in regard to the question of venue and the sufficiency of the proof in respect to this issue. Upon another trial the State should prove this matter clearly, and not leave it open to conjecture. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Weige v. State
196 S.W. 524 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 S.W. 847, 47 Tex. Crim. 64, 1904 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griffith-v-state-texcrimapp-1904.