Griffith v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Griffith v. State

315 S.E.2d 490, 169 Ga. App. 957, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 1773

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 23, 1984

Docket67995

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 315 S.E.2d 490 (Griffith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Griffith v. State, 315 S.E.2d 490, 169 Ga. App. 957, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 1773 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

*957 Deen, Presiding Judge.

The appellant, Alex Griffith, was tried for and convicted of aggravated assault. On appeal, as his sole enumeration of error, Griffith contends that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury that the state had the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt the absence of justification. It does not appear from the record that the appellant requested such a charge or excepted to the charge on self-defense as given. Held:

Unless the omission shifts the burden of proof to the defendant, a trial court’s failure to charge the jury specifically that the state had the additional burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt the absence of justification as raised by the defense is not error. McClenton v. State, 150 Ga. App. 573 (258 SE2d 168) (1979). In this case, the trial court clearly instructed the jury on the state’s burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt each element of the offense charged. The court also charged on acquittal if a reasonable doubt of guilt existed and on the elements of the offense charged, and gave a thorough charge on the law of self-defense. In no way could the jury charge in this case, taken as a whole, be considered burden-shifting.

Judgment affirmed.

McMurray, C. J., and Sognier, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*957 Deen, Presiding Judge.

The appellant, Alex Griffith, was tried for and convicted of aggravated assault. On appeal, as his sole enumeration of error, Griffith contends that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury that the state had the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt the absence of justification. It does not appear from the record that the appellant requested such a charge or excepted to the charge on self-defense as given. Held:

Unless the omission shifts the burden of proof to the defendant, a trial court’s failure to charge the jury specifically that the state had the additional burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt the absence of justification as raised by the defense is not error. McClenton v. State, 150 Ga. App. 573 (258 SE2d 168) (1979). In this case, the trial court clearly instructed the jury on the state’s burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt each element of the offense charged. The court also charged on acquittal if a reasonable doubt of guilt existed and on the elements of the offense charged, and gave a thorough charge on the law of self-defense. In no way could the jury charge in this case, taken as a whole, be considered burden-shifting.

Judgment affirmed.

McMurray, C. J., and Sognier, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

315 S.E.2d 490, 169 Ga. App. 957, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 1773, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griffith-v-state-gactapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack