Griffith v. State

435 So. 2d 398, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 21758
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 29, 1983
DocketNo. 82-2372
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 435 So. 2d 398 (Griffith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Griffith v. State, 435 So. 2d 398, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 21758 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions and his sentences in all respects. In addition, we note that appellant has raised the question of whether this case should be remanded so that the trial court may rule on his earlier filed motion for new trial. No remand is necessary here because by filing a timely notice of appeal, appellant effectively abandoned his motion for new trial. State ex rel. Faircloth v. The District Court of Ap[399]*399peal, Third District, 187 So.2d 890 (Fla. 1966); Perez v. City of Tampa, 181 So.2d 571 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966).

AFFIRMED.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and DANAHY and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gonzalez v. Metro Dade Police Department
578 So. 2d 727 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
In Re Forfeiture of $104,591 in US Currency
578 So. 2d 727 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
435 So. 2d 398, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 21758, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griffith-v-state-fladistctapp-1983.