Griffith v. Johnson

Superior Court of Delaware

Griffith v. Johnson

1 Del. 136

DecidedJuly 1, 1833

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Del. 136 (Griffith v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Griffith v. Johnson, 1 Del. 136 (Del. Ct. App. 1833).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court

rejected the evidence, but remarked if these abstracts were objected to it would be productive of much unnecessary expense in furnishing copies. This was admitted but it was said that it must be left as heretofore to the agreement of the parties. Cases might occur where great injustice would be done by the production of these short memorandums if as a general rule they were regarded as competent evidence.

The case went on to the jury who finally found a verdict in the negative of the issue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court

rejected the evidence, but remarked if these abstracts were objected to it would be productive of much unnecessary expense in furnishing copies. This was admitted but it was said that it must be left as heretofore to the agreement of the parties. Cases might occur where great injustice would be done by the production of these short memorandums if as a general rule they were regarded as competent evidence.

The case went on to the jury who finally found a verdict in the negative of the issue.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Del. 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griffith-v-johnson-delsuperct-1833.