Griffith v. Griffith

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Griffith v. Griffith

561 So. 2d 1205, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2399, 1990 WL 41661

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 12, 1990

DocketNo. 89-2365

StatusPublished

This text of 561 So. 2d 1205 (Griffith v. Griffith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Griffith v. Griffith, 561 So. 2d 1205, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2399, 1990 WL 41661 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s “Order on Petitioner’s Motion for Continuance of Support Alimony, Enforcement of Previous Awards, Attorney’s Fees and Other Relief,” dated October 16, 1989, is affirmed in all respects. We observe, however, that the portion of paragraph two of the order that requires educational expenses to be paid for a period of three years is susceptible of various meanings. While the order indicates that [1206]*1206the three years begins from the date of enrollment, it does not indicate the time within which enrollment must occur. We suggest clarification for the purpose of specifying the inception date of the three-year period for the benefit of the parties.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED for clarification.

SHARP, PETERSON, and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s “Order on Petitioner’s Motion for Continuance of Support Alimony, Enforcement of Previous Awards, Attorney’s Fees and Other Relief,” dated October 16, 1989, is affirmed in all respects. We observe, however, that the portion of paragraph two of the order that requires educational expenses to be paid for a period of three years is susceptible of various meanings. While the order indicates that [1206]*1206the three years begins from the date of enrollment, it does not indicate the time within which enrollment must occur. We suggest clarification for the purpose of specifying the inception date of the three-year period for the benefit of the parties.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED for clarification.

SHARP, PETERSON, and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

561 So. 2d 1205, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2399, 1990 WL 41661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griffith-v-griffith-fladistctapp-1990.