Griffith v. Griffith

561 So. 2d 1205, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2399, 1990 WL 41661
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Griffith v. Griffith. Read the opinion of the Court — 528 So. 2d 1325
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 12, 1990·No. No. 89-2365·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s “Order on Petitioner’s Motion for Continuance of Support Alimony, Enforcement of Previous Awards, Attorney’s Fees and Other Relief,” dated October 16, 1989, is affirmed in all respects. We observe, however, that the portion of paragraph two of the order that requires educational expenses to be paid for a period of three years is susceptible of various meanings. While the order indicates that [1206]*1206the three years begins from the date of enrollment, it does not indicate the time within which enrollment must occur. We suggest clarification for the purpose of specifying the inception date of the three-year period for the benefit of the parties.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED for clarification.

SHARP, PETERSON, and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Griffith v. Griffith, 561 So. 2d 1205, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2399, 1990 WL 41661 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

561 So. 2d 1205 (Griffith v. Griffith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.