Griffith v. Department of Education

West Virginia Court of Claims

Griffith v. Department of Education

21 Ct. Cl. 82

CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims

DecidedMarch 6, 1996

DocketCC-96-30

StatusPublished

This text of 21 Ct. Cl. 82 (Griffith v. Department of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Griffith v. Department of Education, 21 Ct. Cl. 82 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for a decision based upon the allegation sin the Notice of Claim and the respondent’s Answer.

The claimant seeks payment of $150.00 for tuition reimbursement. The respondent, in its Answer, admits the validity and the amount of the claim, but states that there were sufficient funds expired in the appropriate fiscal year with which the tuition could have been paid.

While the Court believes that this is a claim in equity and good conscience should be paid, the Court further believes that an award cannot be recommended based upon the decision in the Airkem Sales and Service, et al. vs. Dept. of Mental Health, 8 Ct. Cl. 180 (1971).

Claim disallowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI