Griffith v. Clark

Fourth Circuit

Griffith v. Clark

678 F. App'x 98

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 27, 2017·No. No. 15-7559·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Michael Griffith appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Griffith v. Clark, No. 5:11-ct-03209-FL, 2015 WL 5554627 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 21, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented' in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Michael Griffith appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Griffith v. Clark, No. 5:11-ct-03209-FL, 2015 WL 5554627 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 21, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented' in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Griffith v. Clark, 678 F. App'x 98 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

678 F. App'x 98 (Griffith v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related