Griffith v. California
364 U.S. 476, 81 S. Ct. 243, 5 L. Ed. 2d 221, 1960 U.S. LEXIS 82
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedDecember 5, 1960
Docket457
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 364 U.S. 476 (Griffith v. California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Griffith v. California, 364 U.S. 476, 81 S. Ct. 243, 5 L. Ed. 2d 221, 1960 U.S. LEXIS 82 (1960).
Opinion
GRIFFITH
v.
CALIFORNIA ET AL.
Supreme Court of United States.
J. B. Tietz for appellant.
Robert E. Reed and R. B. Pegram for the State of California, and Roger Arneberg and Bourke Jones for the City of Los Angeles, appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People Ex Rel. Younger v. County of El Dorado
487 P.2d 1193 (California Supreme Court, 1971)
State Ex Rel. Mondale v. Independent School District No. 31
123 N.W.2d 121 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1963)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
364 U.S. 476, 81 S. Ct. 243, 5 L. Ed. 2d 221, 1960 U.S. LEXIS 82, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griffith-v-california-scotus-1960.