Griffith-Fenton v. Chase Home Finance

531 F. App'x 95

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Appellant Beverley Griffith-Fenton, pro se, appeals from a final judgment dismissing her complaint alleging violations of the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq.; the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, 12 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq.; the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq.; the Home Affordable Modification Program, and various state laws, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), for failure to state a claim. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history of the case, and the issues on appeal.

We review de novo a district court decision dismissing a complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) and § 1915(e)(2). See Litwin v. Blackstone Group, L.P., 634 F.3d 706, 715 (2d Cir.2011); Giano v. Goord, 250 F.3d 146, 149-50 (2d Cir.2001). After an independent review of the record and relevant case law, we affirm for substantially the same reasons articulated by the district court judge in his well-reasoned decision entered May 30, 2012.

We have considered all of Appellant’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.