Griffis v. State

755 So. 2d 202, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4657, 2000 WL 423366
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 20, 2000·No. No. 5D99-3190·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

GRIFFIN, J.

Appellant seeks review of an order of the lower court denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Relying on the decision of the Second District Court of Appeal in Heggs v. State, 718 So.2d 263 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), he contends that the sentencing guidelines applied to his offense were unconstitutionally enacted. The lower court properly followed this court’s decision rejecting this argument. The recent decision of the Florida Supreme Court in Heggs v. State, 25 Fla. L. Weekly S137, — So.2d -, 2000 WL 178052 (Fla. Feb. 17, 2000), however, vali[203]*203dates the appellant’s claim. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for resentencing.1

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DAUKSCH and W. SHARP, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Griffis v. State, 755 So. 2d 202, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4657, 2000 WL 423366 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

755 So. 2d 202 (Griffis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. State
767 So. 2d 614 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)