Griffis v. Herlong

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Griffis v. Herlong

155 So. 2d 185, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3383

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 10, 1963

DocketNo. 3687

StatusPublished

This text of 155 So. 2d 185 (Griffis v. Herlong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Griffis v. Herlong, 155 So. 2d 185, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3383 (Fla. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This interlocutory appeal was brought by the defendants below, after the lower court entered a restraining order and appointed a receiver for Mid-Lakes Motor Co., a Florida corporation. After briefs were filed and arguments heard, a motion to dismiss the appeal was filed herein. Attached to the motion to dismiss was a certified copy of an order entered below in this same case, dated the 13th day of April, 1963, in which the chancellor discharged the receiver, terminated the receivership proceedings, and dissolved the injunction. No pleadings to the appellees’ motion to dismiss have been filed and hence the question we had before us is now moot and the appeal is hereby dismissed.

KANNER, Acting C. J., and ALLEN and SHANNON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This interlocutory appeal was brought by the defendants below, after the lower court entered a restraining order and appointed a receiver for Mid-Lakes Motor Co., a Florida corporation. After briefs were filed and arguments heard, a motion to dismiss the appeal was filed herein. Attached to the motion to dismiss was a certified copy of an order entered below in this same case, dated the 13th day of April, 1963, in which the chancellor discharged the receiver, terminated the receivership proceedings, and dissolved the injunction. No pleadings to the appellees’ motion to dismiss have been filed and hence the question we had before us is now moot and the appeal is hereby dismissed.

KANNER, Acting C. J., and ALLEN and SHANNON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

155 So. 2d 185, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griffis-v-herlong-fladistctapp-1963.