Griffin v. U-Haul International Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Griffin v. U-Haul International Inc.

560 F. App'x 212

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 12, 2014·No. No. 13-2407·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

[213] UNPUBLISHED

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Griffin appeals the district court’s order denying relief on Griffin’s motion to vacate an arbitration award. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Griffin v. U-Haul Int’l Inc., No. 3:13-cv-00346-GCM, 2013 WL 5937322 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

[213] UNPUBLISHED

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Griffin appeals the district court’s order denying relief on Griffin’s motion to vacate an arbitration award. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Griffin v. U-Haul Int’l Inc., No. 3:13-cv-00346-GCM, 2013 WL 5937322 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Griffin v. U-Haul International Inc., 560 F. App'x 212 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

560 F. App'x 212 (Griffin v. U-Haul International Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.