Griffin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Griffin v. State

1926 OK CR 145, 244 P. 821, 34 Okla. Crim. 72, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 132

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 10, 1926

DocketNo. A-5416.

StatusPublished

This text of 1926 OK CR 145 (Griffin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Griffin v. State, 1926 OK CR 145, 244 P. 821, 34 Okla. Crim. 72, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 132 (Okla. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called defendants, were convicted in the county court of Carter county on a charge of petit larceny and the defendant Hazel Fletcher fined $25 and sentenced to imprisonment in the county jail for a term of 30 days and the defendant H. L. Griifin fined $100 and sentenced to imprisonment in the county jail for a term of 30 days.

The case was tried in October, 1924, and the appeal lodged in this court February 22, Í925. No briefs have been filed and no appearance for oral argument made. Where an appeal is prosecuted from a conviction for a misdemeanor and no briefs in support of the appeal filed and no appearance for oral argument, the court will examine the record for jurisdictional errors, and, if none appear and the evidence reasonably supports the verdict, the judgment will be affirmed.

The case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called defendants, were convicted in the county court of Carter county on a charge of petit larceny and the defendant Hazel Fletcher fined $25 and sentenced to imprisonment in the county jail for a term of 30 days and the defendant H. L. Griifin fined $100 and sentenced to imprisonment in the county jail for a term of 30 days.

The case was tried in October, 1924, and the appeal lodged in this court February 22, Í925. No briefs have been filed and no appearance for oral argument made. Where an appeal is prosecuted from a conviction for a misdemeanor and no briefs in support of the appeal filed and no appearance for oral argument, the court will examine the record for jurisdictional errors, and, if none appear and the evidence reasonably supports the verdict, the judgment will be affirmed.

The case is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1926 OK CR 145, 244 P. 821, 34 Okla. Crim. 72, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griffin-v-state-oklacrimapp-1926.