Griffin v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Griffin v. State

329 S.W.3d 404, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 17, 2011 WL 69892

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Griffin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1461 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 11, 2011·No. ED 94785·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Carolyn Griffin (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying her motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value and we affirm by written order. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Carolyn Griffin (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying her motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value and we affirm by written order. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Griffin v. State, 329 S.W.3d 404, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 17, 2011 WL 69892 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

329 S.W.3d 404 (Griffin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.