Griffin v. State
This text of 166 S.E.2d 885 (Griffin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant was convicted of robbery by the use of an offensive weapon and sentenced to nineteen years in the penitentiary. He appeals from the overruling of his motion for new trial. Held:
1. Enumeration of error 1 complains that the court erred in failing to charge on the credibility of witnesses. It is not error to fail to give this charge where, as here, there was no written request therefor. Code Ann. § 70-207 (b) (Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 31; 1966, pp. 493, 498; 1968, pp. 1072, 1078). Wheeler v. State, 220 Ga. 535 (7) (140 SE2d 258).
2. Enumerations of error 2, 3, and 4 complain that the court erred in overruling the motion for new trial on the general grounds. The defendant was identified by the victim and [210]*210another eyewitness to the crime. Another witness who was acquainted with the defendant saw him running from the scene of the robbery immediately thereafter. This evidence was sufficient to support the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
166 S.E.2d 885, 225 Ga. 209, 1969 Ga. LEXIS 434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griffin-v-state-ga-1969.