Griffin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Griffin v. State

268 So. 3d 728

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 19, 2018·No. No. 4D17-3427·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

*729Appellant Charles Griffin appeals his probation revocation and resulting sentence, raising twelve issues. We affirm the revocation and sentence and remand only for the entry of a written order specifying which conditions of the probation agreement were violated. As the State properly concedes, although the trial court orally pronounced the violations of probation, the record lacks a written order. See Robinson v. State , 74 So.3d 570, 572 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) ("Even though the record is clear, a formal, written order specifying each condition of probation violated must be entered in this case. Therefore, we remand for entry of an order in conformity with this opinion.").

Affirmed and remanded with directions.

Warner, May and Forst, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

*729Appellant Charles Griffin appeals his probation revocation and resulting sentence, raising twelve issues. We affirm the revocation and sentence and remand only for the entry of a written order specifying which conditions of the probation agreement were violated. As the State properly concedes, although the trial court orally pronounced the violations of probation, the record lacks a written order. See Robinson v. State , 74 So.3d 570, 572 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) ("Even though the record is clear, a formal, written order specifying each condition of probation violated must be entered in this case. Therefore, we remand for entry of an order in conformity with this opinion.").

Affirmed and remanded with directions.

Warner, May and Forst, JJ., concur.

Griffin v. State, 268 So. 3d 728 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

268 So. 3d 728 (Griffin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related