Griffin v. State

101 So. 3d 399, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19906, 2012 WL 5688785
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 16, 2012·No. No. 1D12-0232·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant’s rule 3.850 motion is facially sufficient to assert a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel to the extent that it alleges a failure to move for a judgment of acquittal on the charged offense of burglary with damage in excess of $1,000.00. The record before us contains no evidence that the damage exceeded $1,000.00 or that there was otherwise a valid reason why counsel did not raise this issue at trial. Consequently, we reverse the order summarily denying the motion and remand the case to the trial court for attachment of records conclusively refuting the claim or an evidentiary hearing.

PADOVANO, ROWE, and RAY, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Griffin v. State, 101 So. 3d 399, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19906, 2012 WL 5688785 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

101 So. 3d 399 (Griffin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Christopher Charles McIntosh v. State of Florida
254 So. 3d 1196 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)