Griffin v. State

867 So. 2d 576, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2579, 2004 WL 384903
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Griffin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 838 So. 2d 1218
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 3, 2004·No. No. 3D03-3394·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lee Griffin appeals from the trial court’s denial of relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. We affirm. The claims raised were either without legal basis (grounds one and three) or should have been raised on direct appeal (ground two). See Harvey v. Dugger; 656 So.2d 1253 (Fla.1995)(holding that “issues that could have been, but were not, raised on direct appeal are not cognizable through collateral attack”); see also State v Franklin, 836 So.2d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. granted, 854 So.2d 659 (Fla.2003)(holding that chapter 99-188 does not violate the single subject rule).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Griffin v. State, 867 So. 2d 576, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2579, 2004 WL 384903 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

867 So. 2d 576 (Griffin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harvey v. Dugger
656 So. 2d 1253 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)
State v. Franklin
836 So. 2d 1112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)