Griffin v. State

713 So. 2d 1077, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8165, 1998 WL 380513
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Griffin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 705 So. 2d 572
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 10, 1998·No. No. 96-04751·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Roger D. Griffin, contends the trial court erred in revoking the probation he was serving for being a felon in possession of a firearm, carrying a concealed firearm, and possession of a firearm with a removed serial number. We affirm the revocation order without discussion. We do, however, remand this cause for correction of the revocation order to accurately reflect that Griffin was found to be in violation of conditions 2, 3, 6, and 7 of his probation, rather than conditions 1 and 3, as the current order indicates.

Affirmed; remanded for corrections.

FRANK, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and CASANUEVA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Griffin v. State, 713 So. 2d 1077, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8165, 1998 WL 380513 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

713 So. 2d 1077 (Griffin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.