Griffin v. State

590 So. 2d 547, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13261, 1991 WL 272649
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Griffin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 603 So. 2d 48
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 20, 1991·No. No. 90-02765·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges his sentences as a habitual offender for two counts of armed robbery with a firearm and one count of aggravated assault. His contention that the armed robberies as first degree felonies punishable by life are not subject to enhancement pursuant to the habitual offender statute is without merit. See Lock v. State, 582 So.2d 819 (Fla.2d DCA 1991).

As to the ten-year sentence on the aggravated assault, the written judgment does not indicate that the sentence was enhanced pursuant to section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1989). The plea and sentencing hearing transcript, however, shows that the court properly declared appellant a habitual offender without limiting its finding to any one of the three felonies for which appellant was being sentenced. The court then orally pronounced a ten-year sentence for the aggravated assault. We therefore remand for correction of the written sentence for the aggravated assault to reflect the oral pronouncement of sentence. The other sentences are affirmed.

SCHOONOVER, C.J., and SCHEB and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Griffin v. State, 590 So. 2d 547, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13261, 1991 WL 272649 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

590 So. 2d 547 (Griffin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lock v. State
582 So. 2d 819 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)