Griffin v. State

435 So. 2d 405, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 21765
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 3, 1983·No. No. 82-1011·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order of revocation of probation and remand this cause for a new revocation proceeding. We believe it was improper, in the absence of consent by the defendant, to conduct a revocation hearing immediately after a trial on the charges that constitute the basis for the revocation petition and before an adjudication on those charges, and to rely at such a hearing solely on the evidence received in the criminal trial as evidence of the violation of probation. Cf. State v. Spratling, 336 So.2d 361 (Fla.1976).

ANSTEAD, C.J., and HURLEY and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Griffin v. State, 435 So. 2d 405, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 21765 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

435 So. 2d 405 (Griffin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Spratling
336 So. 2d 361 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)