Griffin v. State

315 So. 2d 486, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14260
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 16, 1975·No. No. 74-1295·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

SCHEB, Judge.

Appellant, who pled guilty to the offenses of (1) breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony, and (2) grand larceny, was sentenced to ten years, with credit for 93 days served. This general sentence, while within the maximum for the aggregate of the two crimes for which appellant was found guilty, must be vacated since it violates the rule set forth in Darden v. State, Fla.App.2d 1975, 306 So.2d 581.

We reject the appellant’s further contention that he can be sentenced only for the higher of the two offenses of which he stands convicted. Estevez v. State, Fla.1975, 313 So.2d 692. Moreover, having failed to show any prejudice, .the appellant’s contention that there was an inadequate showing of factual basis for his plea of guilty to each charge, must also fail. Williams v. State, Fla.1975, 316 So 2d 267.

[487]*487Accordingly, the convictions are affirmed, but the general ten-year sentence is vacated. The case is remanded for resen-tencing to apportion the ten-year sentence between the two convictions.

BOARDMAN, A. C. J., and GRIMES, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Griffin v. State, 315 So. 2d 486, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14260 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

315 So. 2d 486 (Griffin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dorfman v. State
351 So. 2d 954 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)
Carter v. State
330 So. 2d 508 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)